A U.S. decide rejected requests to sever JPMorgan Chase & Co’s lawsuit accusing former government Jes Staley of concealing what he knew about Jeffrey Epstein from two associated lawsuits over its work for the late intercourse offender.
Monday’s determination by U.S. District Decide Jed Rakoff in Manhattan is a defeat for Staley, and for ladies who declare that Epstein sexually abused them and are additionally suing the most important U.S. financial institution.
Epstein was a JPMorgan shopper from 2000 to 2013. The U.S. Virgin Islands, the place the financier had a house, can be suing JPMorgan.
A trial in all three instances is scheduled for Oct. 23.
In a separate determination, Rakoff rejected JPMorgan’s request to dam the U.S. Virgin Islands from increasing its lawsuit by including a obstruction cost and a declare that financial institution executives joked about Epstein’s curiosity in younger women.
Associated: JPMorgan Could Face Expanded Lawsuit Over Jeffrey Epstein Ties
Staley, 66, is a former JPMorgan personal banking chief who later spent six years as Barclays Plc’s chief government earlier than resigning in November 2021.
He had argued that the trial schedule left him too little time to defend in opposition to JPMorgan’s “slanderous” accusations.
However the decide known as Staley a “distinguished focus” of all three instances, and famous that his Washington regulation agency Williams & Connolly calls itself one of many world’s “premier” litigation corporations.
“None of Staley’s whines remotely warrants both a severance or a change within the joint trial date,” Rakoff wrote.
EPSTEIN ACCUSERS ‘WILL NOT COWER’
Epstein’s accusers, in the meantime, accused JPMorgan of suing Staley as a way to “harass and intimidate” them into revealing personal medical information and communications of their case.
Rakoff, nonetheless, stated the accusers “can not have been blind” to their must disclose delicate info.
And in letting the U.S. Virgin Islands amend its criticism, Rakoff stated the territory shouldn’t have delayed bringing an obstruction declare however JPMorgan had provided no credible arguments in opposition to bringing one now.
Brendan Sullivan, a lawyer for Staley, didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.
Brad Edwards, a lawyer for the accusers, stated in an e mail: “The choice is in accord with the regulation. The survivors we symbolize are sturdy and won’t cower to bullying by banks, so we’ll proceed to show what’s a really sturdy case.”
JPMorgan didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.
The U.S. Virgin Islands seeks unspecified damages in its lawsuit, whereas the accusers are searching for doubtlessly billions of {dollars} in theirs.
JPMorgan sued Staley final month to have him cowl its losses in each lawsuits and forfeit eight years of compensation.
Staley has expressed remorse for his pleasant relationship with Epstein, and denied understanding about his alleged crimes.
He has additionally been accused of swapping sexually suggestive messages with Epstein about younger girls, and committing sexual assault himself.
Epstein killed himself at age 66 in August 2019 in a Manhattan jail whereas awaiting trial for intercourse trafficking.
The instances within the U.S. District Court docket, Southern District of New York are: Jane Doe 1 v JPMorgan Chase & Co, No. 22-10019; Authorities of the U.S. Virgin Islands v JPMorgan Chase Financial institution NA, No. 22-10904; and JPMorgan Chase Financial institution NA v Staley, in Nos. 22-10019 and 22-10904.
A very powerful insurance coverage information,in your inbox each enterprise day.
Get the insurance coverage trade’s trusted e-newsletter
